There is never a harm in setting up a business except that is costs money and that can be done inexpensively especially when you do it yourself.

The prices may be quite a bit lower, so ask yourself why--one reason is that the dues, fees, fines, and assessments can/will be increased/added sometimes for reasons with which you totally disaagree, that might be harmful to your unit, and that you have no choice but to comply with.

I don't see how it would be retaliation, I am not trying to get even with the guy or anything, he hasn't harmed me other than just being a pest.

You got the signed lease,first, last and security..I see no harm in letting them move in 2 days early.

If it was a sex offense then having him go to properties solo again can be risky and possibly harm business.

You will hear some claim on BP, not Ken, that compliance is not required if the note predates the Act, not true in all respects.I can say that when a violation of law is discovered and the violator has then taken steps to comply after their discovery, there is an entirely different attitude taken by regulators, often to the point of no harm no foul.

I also noticed when building PPC campaigns a lot of $ is wasted on clicks that are of no substance.

The more likely result from the lender's point of view is probably "no harm, no foul" unless there are larger problems with the loan (as someone else mentioned).

Well, no harm in throwing out a question and may be learn, if there is really such an option."

It gave me more substance on which to make my decision.Ill base some of my calculations on that.I am in agreement that paying off debt can be thought of as a return on your money.