If the fact that a DOS clause is/would be invoked if the insurance policy changes, I would walk away before potentially diminishing or even sacrificing coverage by trying to “skirt” the correct way to insure the property.

On the other hand I'm in a growth and acqudision stay and want to get to 10 as quick as possible without sacrificing quality!

I really don't know how we do it, but every year we find ways to reduce what it costs us to live without sacrificing quality of life.

Yes it sucks, but you have to realize that he is sacrificing a lot to go into the military and that is why these relief acts are in place.

-Paid for SFH are not worth the headache and risk as your ROI is low and all your equity is at risk- Constant sacrificing to save money to buy homes is not worth it.

Just seems like you're sacrificing quite a bit of cash flow in order to get these deals done past number 4.

Starting with Wisconsin and then branching out across the country, we will strive to bring affordable housing to all, without sacrificing quality.

I racked up $25k in 0% interest credit cards, I borrowed $5k from my Dad, I borrowed against my 401(k), I sacrificed eating out and cable TV, I did whatever I needed to get the project done.  

In other words to bring it back to this thread would you, assuming you were in an earlier stage of your investing like most of us, go after 2% markets or go after higher appreciation markets if doing so meant sacrificing any hope of cash flow after mortgage payments?

I look at what is my biggest expenses and routinely spend time trying to figure out a way to save without sacrificing too much of my time or the tenants.I self manage all my properties and place all tenants.