Their courses are very good overall, but you should expect to pay a handsome price for them. 

On the other hand, some people with more to invest, may prefer other options.  

(On the other hand, some hard money lenders are predatory, so they might just be hoping you default.)Good luck

Well, guess what, now the cannabis REIT is trading over $170 a share AND it also offers a handsome dividend.

Perhaps even more handsome than Chris Hemsworth.My newfound greatness comes with a lot of responsibility.

These houses come with the price to have: you'll pay handsomely even after your mortgage is paid off.As an opposite: Beachwood, same zip 44122, but totally different: plenty of companies paying taxes, good school (it's much smaller that Shaker, but Beachwood schools got much higher ratings now).Let's see how's the property taxes there: house for $695K, property taxes are only $14.5K.

All I'm saying is that I did it twice and both times it has paid off handsomely and I'm very glad I did it both times.

Again, not a strategy for a newbie BUT, doing this improves neighborhoods and the real estate developers and investors who are willing to do this, can get rewarded handsomely.

You provide the initial capital for the purchase and finance and they refinance - Depending on the cash you have at hand, some brokerages like Merrill Lynch allow you to borrow against it at a nominal rate.

hi - i am reading two contradictory thing when second place lender forecloses.one is that second place has to pay the first mortgager first. this is the whole talk about senior liens, and basis of why second place will not foreclose if property is under water.on the other hand, some say second can sell at auction "subject to" first mortgage. well in this case, second has clearly recovered their debt before paying the senior lien. this is contradictory to above.this forms the basis of stories like first lender came foreclosing again after someone purchased the second foreclosure.i see that in either case first lender gets paid. but in the latter case - first lender is now at  worse risk - because the original owner is now probably evicted - and is in a worse shape to pay up.anyway, which one is true?