Besides do you really want tenants destroying that property and having to renovate to sell.

For short term rentals (or any length for that matter), do not leave out anything that you are unwilling to get stolen or destroyed. 

The sales offices of various projects such as Vanke, Longhu and Hesheng have been destroyed, and some project owners have also physical conflict with security guards.In September, there were several reports of "real estate rage" across the country.

Keep it simple, tenants are capable of destroying anything.

There is a difference between living like a slob and destroying a rental.

That will (rightly) destroy the cheats... going back to 2008 I could see people getting hit with 100k tax bills with fines.

On top of that, what if all of a sudden you need a new roof, or windows, or a sewer line, or the irrigation system freezes, leaks and floods the basement, or a fire guts the place and your insurance only covers some of the vacancy/rebuild costs, or a flood washes it away and you didn't have flood insurance, or your tenant stops paying and their estranged lover/stiffed drug dealer breaks in and destroys the place, or any one of a myriad possible bad things happens because you have an investment that hinges upon human behavior, and therefor needs constant baby sitting, and 5 years of your glorious $500/month is wiped out in one afternoon, and the bank takes the property?

They may be fine now, but in the summer the heat gets through the first layer of shingles and the second layer will eventually curl, causing flat pockets of water to form that will eventually leak down through and destroy the sheathing and the rafters/drywall underneath.

My primary residence neighborhood was 100% destroyed (FEMA designation).

However, most smart people will tell you NEVER allow a seller to stay after closing.Who cares what the seller wants... your very real risk is a holdover tenant who could destroy the place once he figures out he sold for $130k less than value.