I did look at the pic and see what you're saying (and then removed it because it showed you the last 4 of your cc)We're soon going to be rebuilding our forum posting interface and the new one will allow for images of this type.

In terms of user interface, features, performance, ease of use and almost every aspect, Realtor.com is inferior compared to Zillow or Trulia. 

It has a good interface for landlords as well as tenants.  

Professional looking, well organized, clean (not cluttered) interface on your company website.

From the perspective of the "retail" investor, the interface could be similar to prosper or lending club but the intermediary will need to have more financial information about the investor.

Assign "names" to the positions/functions later, but define what responsibilities each role plays and how the different "player" interface with each other.

With Padlister and Padmapper, landords and apt. seekers don't need to mess with the clunky CL user interface, even though CL is still the underlying software.Does anyone disagree with me or have other comments?

What separates Zillow from an appraisal is the human interface and "manual adjustments".

I just like the map interface of Zillow.

I don't know anything about the software, but when it comes to analyzing rehab deals, it's as basic as the following formula:Profit = ARV - Purchase Price - Rehab Costs - Fixed CostsIf you know 4 of the 5 variables, you can rearrange the formula to determine the other one (for example, to know your max offer, your max rehab budget, etc).My guess is that this software (or any software that allows you to analyze a rehab deal) basically just puts a user interface around that formula, and spits out some additional ROI metrics on top of it.It's nothing you can't do in Excel or on the back of a napkin.