Since harm is being done by their inaccurate data, and they have been notified, I am considering the possibility of involving my lawyer.

I knew they weren't mine didn't see harm in looking.

I'd bet they'd do more harm than good.

If it's an empty house, it doesn't really matter how long it takes you to get a deal, no harm, no foul.

As long as you're tenant is paying rent, the only "harm" is that your tenant is doing it behind your back.

Hmmmm let me sleep on this,no harm in trying.

now granted you have income to off set.. but the lender will usually discount that income and valuations to the point that it does not do you any good it can harm you when your looking for Development loans which are about as tough as they come to get..  

However the Defendant did harm the Plaintiff fairly badly due to his negligence and should have paid. 

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

Small errors with good intentions, no harm no foul I doubt will be worth the time or effort, cease and desist, make it right and move on.Jerry, if I were you, I'd dig in on the finance side, few other attorneys will have the expertise and there will always be buyer/borrowers in trouble.....it's not that hard. :)