I actually have much stronger feelings against it, but as I work here and represent the company, I'll keep those to myself.

Carrots make sticks stronger.

It ican be stronger then I saw the dog on facebook.

That seems to defuse the "professional complainers" - it's not that I'm rejecting them, I'm just taking the stronger applicants.

However if the shared amount is only roughly 1/2 a month, it is pretty clear the agent is being greedy.I think a 2 year commitment is stronger than a 1 year lease, but I think the 3rd year doesn't have a lot of value to the landlord.  

There is always a reason to accept any application over another, one has a higher income, one has a longer employment record, one has a stronger credit profile.  

You pay more per door but rent growth is stronger generally and the area is better.

A conviction for theft, where she lied about the circumstances related to the conviction when asked.My gut was initially to rent to this person, because she had a kid and for the last few years had references (including a lawyer who had rented to her) who said she'd been a good tenant.Ultimately, I declined to rent to her because I had much stronger applicants.

All purpose is stronger.

There would be no reason to run reports then.Actually, you are not required to accept the first person who applied if a later applicant is a stronger candidate and better meets your rental criteria.