That's a battle you won't win.

Choose your battles...Again, I'm NOT an attorney, and this is NOT legal advice.

@Brandon Battle

Sorry for the radio silence, it has been a difficult process and I wanted to ensure CSC is done and gone for good.After a 3.5 month battle with CSC/Coinmach, I am happy to have finally had the last of their machines removed from our properties.

These battle stories are great, and certainly a valuable education for landlords. 

And if he’s scaring off tenants and making your life hell in the meantime you might have some sort of case of opportunity cost.I would also advise talking to a lawyer sooner rather than later because if it does come to a legal battle the first person to file has a little bit of a psychological upper hand in the court system, or so I’ve been told- especially when it comes to disputes rather than overtly criminal behavior.Also I’m sorry for your loss.

In that case you are the claimant and he is the defendant.If you were not named as an additional insured on the tenants policy your insurance would have to provide defense costs and the courts would go through a drawn out battle to determine the percentage of liability you both had (say tenant 80% and you 20%).

From there, you have to decide how to handle this;  For sure this is a loss, because you have to spend money on unit turnover, down time from leasing, etc..Normally, I try not to engage in battles. 

I'm not a fan of "no and low money down" methods- they're too much of an uphill battle in most cases.

Depending on census tract and surrounding land use, it can be an uphill battle.