Answers to any or all question are much appreciated! 

Or would it be better to finance some, or all, of each purchase, so that more properties can be purchased?

With inventions like printing presses, telegraphs, and internal combustion engines maintaining the rule of law over distance became alot easier, and states (countries, not TN or AL) are now able to ensure the veracity of their paper currency.

At some point (not yet), I will take most or all of my chips off the CA table and place them in a more stable market in another state while awaiting the next CA correction.

You could provide some or all the purchase money, and he could do (and fund) the rehab...or vice versa, and you can split the profits 50/50 or any percentage that both parties agree to.Both the investment and the payout can be from 1% to 99% - it comes down to what you and your partner(s) agree to up front.Some things to consider:Rule #1 - Put it in writing.Who holds title?

If humans, including 'experts' in any field, can't precisely with 100% certainty forecast any particular event -- you can't expect zillow or the zestimate tool to.Many websites attempt to estimate property value and there are variances between most or all of them.

Every PM company I spoke to wanted a portion or all of the 1st months rent INCLUDING the usual 8-10% fee. 

It is up to the Seller to accept or reject some or all of your terms.

They all look on paper and in webinars.We read posts on BP all the time where members have only looked at one opportunity and they want to know if they should invest, where members invest with only inexperienced sponsors, or all in one investment club, or in only in one geographic area, or asset class, etc...scary.

Is it ready for any or all of the above-referenced scenarios?