You could try and get someone at city hall to put in writing their interpretation of the law LOL.  

If  as a landlord the nuance in their interpretation vs yours goes over your head then the LOL is on you. 

It sounds odd that the law can be interpreted differently by experienced magistrates but it's the way it is.

I like the way Ray Dalio interprets the economic impacts of the coronavirus.

I would be curious if there is a different interpretation from sponsors but presumably they are checking your registration when you apply as an investor under this new definition, and if you aren't registered I would think they would not allow you to invest regardless of if you passed the 65 or not.   

I think it is common to have different interpretations of the Bible/Testaments.

Accredited Investors generally have a net worth of 1 million or more excluding primary residence or 2 consecutive years of 200k income or more individual or 300k married.This is just a loose interpretation so everyone needs to research criteria on their own.Some sponsors only take accredited investors for projects and others take on non-accredited also.Options for buyers vary.

If it only says "within seven days" it can be open to interpretation.

A lot is going to depend on how your accountant chooses to interpret those living spaces.  

"All moneys paid to the landlord by the tenant as a deposit as security for performance of the tenant's obligations in a lease or rental agreement shall promptly be deposited by the landlord in a trust account, maintained by the landlord for the purpose of holding such security deposits for tenants of the landlord---- You are just a little off base with your interpretation due to the bold wordings of the law.