The wacky guidelines of 2000 I dont want to see, there were no foundations for them and they got us into this mess.I like the fact that you mentioned the dotcoms, which was another sector that had no fundamentals and many ealy signs that people ignored.

It may seem general but if somebody could just say a word or two about the topic to give me a better orientation I'd appreciate it.ORIGINAL MESSAGE:I really need to get something fundamentally clear here.

The funneling of assets into risk is masking the deteriorating fundamentals and giving the appearance of a market that has bottomed.

We are fundamentally $13k short in cash flow to hit our 12% return target.

We have capital ready to invest with todayQuestions1.)If we have a long-term horizon, does it make sense to take less cash returns now for fundamentally good areas, with very good schools, stable neighborhoods, etc?

Actually, I was very impressed at how classy Mark Cuban and gang were after winning.It just proves that fundamentals are far more important than flash.

@Brice Hall, I think you're actually misunderstanding something fundamental about capital expenses.

The fundamentals have completely disappeared as of two years ago. 

Some of the other fundamentals are also strong - close to Bart, freeway and next to the schoolRecent sales have been encouraging.

I suggest you ask yourself a more fundamental question.