I would never reject that...and it didn't make your 1% rule.So, again, please do share how you came up with this concept. 

Any reason to reject any applicant is reason enough to do so to mitigate your risk.Always consider the worse case scenario when selecting applicants to screen, assuming the best will only lead to trouble.

But sometimes people fall in love with the initial profit projections of a specific deal and reject any data gathered after that point that shows it to be less than they thought or even an unprofitable deal.

My husband and I are in a serious situation with a 203K loan that closed/funded and is now at a complete standstill due to the town rejecting permits because of a FEMA regulation that was missed. 

This morning they rejected my counteroffer and reduced the listing price of the house to $84,900. 

As soon as possible request an increase from the housing authority and your cash flow improves.in these situations i have never had a rate increase rejected, it is only a matter of hom much they will approve.

If your regular insurance company won't write a policy (State Farm rejected my last one), pick up a "builder's risk" policy on it to cover you. 

You can save your favorites, make notes and reject properties you don't like.

Tenant Rejection NoticeAs of 1-Jan-2016, if an applicant is rejected, California Civil Code CC $1785.3 now requires a written notice to be sent.

I pitched the idea to my family and they totally shot us down, plus they have no money (lol), so I'm feeling stalled after the bank rejection due to my employment status.