Sorry, it doesn't sit right with me.Also seems to be a pretty blatant violation of the equal protections clause, although they don't seem to care much about that anymore

If you see someone violating the rules, create a post with "@moderators" and we will receive a notification and respond.Again, welcome to BiggerPockets and happy investing!

ThanksIf you allow her to live without paying her part of rent, you are likely violating the terms of section 8.

Mentioned usury so as long as you dont violated that .. and one note one investor not tied to any project..

However, I've personally stopped taking Section 8 tenants because they ultimately resulted in lower rent income, a higher rate of lease violations and problems, and increased costs at turnover.It also depends on your market.

If you see someone violating the rules, create a post with "@moderators" and we will receive a notification and respond.Again, welcome to BiggerPockets and happy investing!

If you see someone violating the rules, create a post with "@moderators" and we will receive a notification and respond.Again, welcome to BiggerPockets and happy investing!

@Thomas S.Setting standard to violate laws is illegal.

I would hit them with a pet violation or whatever your policy is.

It states that side deals are a violation of the contract.