This charge was clearly non-violent (if it is as you described), and sounds like it was probably more akin to a teenager stealing a street sign than it was a pattern of criminal behavior.  

I dunno...all I can say is that maybe being forced into being irrational breeds more irrational behavior.

If you have bad tenants, who from the beginning, sought to over-pack a Rental, with many people living in it; then their behavior will never end, including with who were invited in, to over-crown the Rental.

So, if you give them your skin, without putting them in a position to lose any themselves if they don't act responsibly, and then only you suffer the consequences - you haven't allowed them to learn any real life consequences for their behavior. 

Most important that hasn't been mentioned yet is to be sure the lease penalizes bad behavior including passing on all any costs of ordinance violations to the tenant. so if you get fined for their behavior, they pay. 

You don't want to risk that bad behavior starting back up again on your property.

It opened my eyes to the behaviors of the wealthy vs the behaviors of the poor.

Overall- I not only see nothing wrong with the OP's question, as many have known the exact behavior he is talking about.

pps - The run on toilet paper is hysteria and such nonsensical behavior doesn't do anyone any good. 

Moratorium extension thru 30 June 21.You want to call your rep, here's some talking points (in my monthly apt eMail, so criticism appreciated):Interfering with commercial and contract law – The moratoria go directly to the ability of two people to enter a contract (ie lease) and either being able to enforce the same contract.Rewarding bad behaviors and discouraging good – If this bill passes, most tenants that are diligent and follow the terms of their lease with payments are now wondering why they did it since those that are don’t pay are getting a bailout.