All but one of these is usually visible and apparent on your first meeting, i.e. a landlord could assume an applicant wearing a hijab is of the Muslim faith, or someone of darker skin tone is of ethnic descent, or a person who walks with a cane or is wheelchair-bound has a disability, or a person who speaks Spanish fluently (or conversely doesn't speak English well) is of Hispanic or Latin or non-American descent, or a woman is, well, a woman.

You don't ask a blind person, or someone in a wheelchair if they are disabled.  

I've got an absolutely stunning young lady in escrow right now for an investment property that nets >$16k/month between SSA, SSA disability because she is in a wheelchair, pension, and life insurance payouts. 

Even if they are blind or in a wheelchair, that does not make it obvious that they would need two dogs instead of one.People don't need to immediately rush to find an attorney to pay.  

It's like charging someone extra because they have a wheelchair. 

However, landlords need not undertake changes that would seriously impair their ability to run their business, such as installing an elevator to the third floor to accommodate a wheelchair-bound tenant’s wish to live there.?"

He was single and said he took care of his sick mother who was in a wheel chair.

Another example of a reasonable accommodation would be if they are in a wheelchair and they need an assigned parking spot close to their apartment, or a bar installed in the bathroom to help them get in and out of the tub.So, you can't charge them anything for the service animal, because they are not a "pet" they are a medical device, basically.You do not have to accept an animal that would create a financial hardship - for instance if it was a pit bull and you would lose your insurance if you had a pitbull on the property. 

Hi Everyone,I am newbie here, I bought triplex 2 years ago and came with one of really sick tenant and he live by himself.  2 years ago his ill was not that bad but gotten worse reasonly and he is in wheel chair, the property not suitable for him to stay (we have no ramp). 

That would be the only occupancy limitation for residences for any group protected under the ADA, other than special needs categories (wheel chair access, etc.).The whole point of this is to protect the disabled (in this case prior addicts / alcoholics) from being pushed out of a community through unfair ordinances, simply because the community doesn't want them there.