It's very easy to make one tiny, minor assumption to fill in an unknown that completely changes the context and consequently the answer - I've caught myself doing this a few times.As far as the legal responsibility for the debt goes with Subject To, my guess would be that the contract basically provides a pathway for the seller to pursue the buyer for recourse related to losses they suffer from the default of the original loan, like a form of indemnification, but does not absolve the seller of responsibility for the debt.

A handy search bar in the upper right makes it easy to find previous discussions, blogs, podcasts, and other resources.

There’s more renters than landlords so it’s easy to pass these things.

Quote from @Gavin Souto: brrrr still works it's just not as easy to turn around quickly.

Simple does NOT mean "easy" or pain free. 

Yes, they have some high fees but all and all such an easy process.

This has got to be easy street buying tax liens and deeds.VIRTUAL wholesaling, VIRTUAL tax lien investing, VIRTUAL auction bidding…..REAL BANKRUPTCY! 

Possible (but I doubt easy) if seller takes a 2nd / subordinate position to the bank or is secured by other property you own.

It's easy to get bogged down by too much software in today's world.

It is easy to provide well-intended 'bad' advice.My questions to you would be... 1.