No.That's the term, it's already part of the RE vernacular and is instantly translated by the listener when it's heard.

I suspect this is also an indicator that despite the loud calls by some factions for this type of action,  most people realize its a lose/lose proposition.The risk with all these eviction and late fee bans is in the long term it probably will 1) erode the sense of responsibility around paying rent (and costs for any other essential services) and 2) attract the type of people who are more likely to take advantage of such a situation for their own gain.

Also, if you plan to hold the building long-term, it will eventually make a better investment.

But I think long term it's got the potential to be a bedroom type commuity to San Antonio, there's starting to be more development on that side of San Antonio and I think employment is going to go up in Pleasonton. 

If you hold for the long term it will all come out in the wash.

Sure, it will be more expensive to start, but in the long term it will be more passive and you will build true wealth.

I knew that in the long term it was a solid buy. 

However, in the short term it has the volatility of the stock market, which cycles much faster and more severely than the volatility of the direct real estate market.

It would be painful to have the easy money and loans go away but in the long term it doesn’t work.  

Help the environment and increase your net worth $1K for each 5 minutes is great.I agree San Diego appreciation has come in spurts but for the long-term it historically has gone up faster than inflation and faster than virtually all other locales.