Am I reading too much into this, should I stay well away, or just be cautious of the situation?

Is he being overly cautious with his advice, ie. can you leave a little space around a replacement AC as it sits in the slightly larger sleeve without it overheating??

In the end I just suggest being cautious.

Considering that the FTC and CFPB actually have a cooperation agreement, I'd venture that major lenders tread very cautiously in that territory.Nothing personal, guys.

But if this is your first deal with these guys I would be very cautious to say the least.If your looking to fund projects in the Philadelphia area feel free to give me a shout and I'd be more than happy to connect with you.

You might be told "that's not legal" by attorney who is just being overly cautious with their own ticket.  

You need to do what works for you, but be cautious you arent getting into a duplex that will be flat or underwater for a decade. i know people who are just coming out of the red on properties in the bay area that they bought in 2005.

Once the tenants turn over I will need to be more cautious on giving out my information.

I am still worried about dropping oil prices in my neck of the woods so am being pretty cautious.

at least one of the replies in this thread seemed to suggest that is actually in order, though i dont see why that's necessary as it can easily be argued that all workers that contractors/subcontractors bring onto the site are that sub/contractor's liability lest even the principal (ie, homeowner) be literally standing at the door 24/7 requiring w4s and i9s of ever person who enters the property to work while its the sub/contractors job under contract.oh and again, i was wondering what is the most litigiously cautious yet practical way to permit sub/contractors to bring and show their prospective next client(s) the work once completed, i mean what if such next client of the contractor suddenly slips and falls down the stairs or something after the contracted work is done?