The lot limited the depth of the home and caused the rear of the home to be really not as deep as needed.

You first started off a little skeptical until you realized the depth of this case.

Your opinion is appreciated and since your in that field adds depth to the conversation.

You are absolutely right that there are more in depth ways to analyze a property.

But as I get more in depth with this and other sites, I'm beginning to re think that position.

In your case, I'd ask why a culvert and low bridge would not work providing access to the back 1/3 of the property.....and if it's a creek, it probably would serve as an economical alternative to forcing sale and buying access.The width and depth as well as water flow will have a bearing on your economic viability to install a bridge.

Obviously one street can be far better or worse than another street in a neighborhood which requires more in depth research, but information on specific companies would still be helpful to narrow down my search.

The preliminary numbers indicate this is worth a more in-depth analysis.

Because if the business plan is well written and documented, it is going to be very long and most investors won't take the time to read it in depth before making a decision.I have been on both sides.

For a short cite, Nolo's Every Landlord's Legal Guide 110-115 (12th Ed) goes on in depth on the issue.