As for properly collateralized performing notes in Vegas I think those are quite safe.

But ultimately, any cost to the syndicator is ultimately a cost to the deal, which means that at the end of the day it costs the investor.Investors that can find quality sponsors, and do proper due diligence on them, can save an entire layer of cost by investing directly with those carefully selected sponsors versus investing through crowdfunding portals.Good luck!

if yes then you got the answer, an appraiser will never come in with the proper value of A turnkey, because they rely on local comps even though those comps need much work and the principal is already done and cash flowing.2- These turnkey sellers usually purchase there properties for far below market value, if this is the case the appraiser might appraise for A lower amount due to the previous sale on the property.I don't know what turnkey seller specifically you are talking about of, but if their customers are happy then you got your answer, if their customers claim they were ripped of then you got the answer as well.

It seems like a complex process, especially when it comes to coordinating contractors, supervising renovations, and ensuring everything goes according to plan.Could you share any advice or practical experience on how to handle these types of projects efficiently from a distance?

I've built a $18M RE portfolio without ever having to do a syndication.I hope I answered your question properly!

If he truly felt like I had wronged him, he must follow the proper channels. 

It’s so comprehensive that I’m compelled to give you a great answer, but there is so much to unpack that a full proper answer to every question may take longer than I have tonight.

If an asset is throwing off a certain yield that is not commiserate with it's risk, then investors will then begin paying more for that asset, thus decreasing it's yield....or start paying less for the asset which would increase it's yield, until it was at the proper risk/return rate to produce the yield that is truly reflective of it's risk.The problem is novice real estate investors get the risk/reward correlation backwards.

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

Not a position anybody wants to be in, but he apparently doesn't disclose that.There are ways to do this much more safely, but of course, you need proper training and to be told what to avoid.It is predatory.