Someone working for free has no incentive not to perpetually leave your property on the back burner.

Also, what are the asset protection/tax advantages and disadvantages of choosing an "at will" (or perpetual) vs. a "term" (specified number of years)?

My thought is that they do not anticipate holding the assets into perpetuity, in fact without saying too much I am fairly certain that is the case.

I am just shocked at how stereo-typically bad the management company experience has been.  

Hustle. 2.5 years ago I was just another sad veteran stereotype: Back from Afghanistan.

The goal in 10 years is to eventually earn $300k ($150k each) annually in perpetuity.

Also properties , especially multi family have been selling if rehabbed right and you don't buy into the stereotypes and negative press.

Refer to FEDERAL status and gateway tendency to move onto opiates, meth, LSD, etc =LStill yet it seems its what most everyone is spending their disposable income on these days perhaps to escape the economy, pollution, chemtrails, weekly massacres and perpetual war?

But, if I were a typical American, unaware of these plans, and unprepared to research them, then the fact of the matter is that I would not INTEND to use the money in a 401(k) to make lifestyle changes.I believe that in my case, the 401(k) has very little relevance, as I plan to achieve indefinitely sustainable financial freedom very early in life, which would likely result in my wealth continuing to expand perpetually. 

@Kelly McMillan  unfortunately pits and large dogs get an extremely bad rap because they are stereotyped.