I'm talking about specific life events he calls out.The more of his stuff I read, the more discrepancies I noticed.

I'm starting to parse through the discrepancy in the different rules of thumbs I've been introduced to by others, thanks for you comments and clarity, Jon.I've seen numbers that a home MIGHT make financial sense after @ 15 years, before that, renting is often better.

CBRE is a major commercial firm.First discrepancy is your MLS says 6129 square feet and the listing broker says in the flier 7,000.Also flier says CURRENTLY 100% occupied with currently being the key word.Discount crap words such as currently,potentially,etc.It's nothing more than a listing broker trying to make it sound better than it really is.I will respond to the other items directly to you.

How is this discrepancy reconciled?

Sold for $219,900 on your list, $200,000 on zillow.This consistent discrepancy between the sold prices in your data and in zillow (which is from public records) is interesting.

Your address, phone number, etc.They should appear identical everywhere, so there's no discrepancy. 

I'm seeing a huge discrepancy between what investors are actually looking for from a wholesaler and what most wholesalers provide.

I asked what the discrepancy was, and I wasn't given a clear answer.

So, insurance is provided assuring good title to the property and in the event of any insured claim, the insurance takes care of the indemnification required, including costs to cure any title discrepancy.

So now I'm confused with the huge discrepancy in the advice being given.Personally, I like to use the 1% rule: The rent minus owner-paid utilities should be at least 1% of the fixed-up cost of purchasing the property.