I just got an application from a BRHP voucher holder. 

Please keep in mind that neither a title agent nor loan broker is party to the title policy or mortgage so cannot bind the title insurer or holder of the mortgage with their opinion. 

Also, if your loan was conventional; Fannie Mae recognizes the legitimacy of a QC between the mortgage holders and the LLC so long as the LLC is controlled by the borrowers; If the property was owned prior to closing by a limited liability corporation (LLC) that is majority-owned or controlled by the borrower(s), the time it was held by the LLC may be counted towards meeting the borrower’s six-month ownership requirement.

Doesn’t make sense Sorry, only the mortgage holder can release the mortgage.

I'm guessing we're talking theory here but I just recently called one of my note holders on a 10 year balloon (yes, I made the mistake and didn't follow advice on more than one occasion).

With a private company provider they can only go after the account holder.

We have a website here also Tnpublichousing.com that is the recommended housing search website that voucher holders are encouraged to go to when looking for S8 friendly housing. 

But to that same effect, the ownership interests of the LLC can be creative in a way that if their lender looks, they can still say that they (as co-borrowers) are still majority holders and the transfer was for their estate planning/asset protection purposes, which is a strong rationale for allowing an LLC transfer (which can then be easily owned in parts by people's trusts).

Also, I recommend getting everything in writing, so confirm in writing from the housing authority that they will pay $2,100 per month if you accept a particular Section 8 voucher holder for your vacant unit. 

Owning real estate where the deed holder is an LLC (if done correctly) is a powerful asset protection tool.