And within a reasonable timeframe where the seller avoids foreclosure when the buyer doesn't pay the sellers note, or at least received adequate compensation for the damage to their credit and costs to defend themselves? 

The defendant should have been served papers atleast once plus it would have been advertised in the local paper

I wanted to find out if I can bypass summary of ejectment process since as per the form and/or process, the defendant should have entered into possession of premises described as a lessee of plaintiff.

What I have to coach them on is that I'll write as low of a low ball offer as you want to right, but we need to be able to defend it. 

The Borrower/Seller shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the buyer and all persons or assigns, regardless of responsibility, from all costs, expenses, suits, liabilities, damages, attorney fees and claims of every type, including but not limited to those arising out of injury to any person, or damage to any real or personal property to any person, including the borrower and said financial institution, for; (i) any items resulting from the buyer buying the property, (ii) information furnished by the borrower or (iii) those items relating to the financial information, or (iv) the ability or inability to pay for or continue to support the debt of which the buyer is agreeing to. 

I personally haven't met him or even talked to him, so I'm not here to defend him. 

Bill doesn't need me to defend him but it's the hyper - sensitive BS detectors that keep BP's integrity off the charts. 

Why are you so eager to defend the entire category, when it includes so many bad actors?

Moreover, you can be sued for any reason, especially if you have rental property, and if you have plenty of insurance, the costs of defending yourself shouldn't come out of pocket.That is kind of a down and dirty that just scratched the surface, but to answer your question, I personally would go with a variation of option 3.

How are any of you STILL defending DMM?!