Granted the park has to be vetted etc and this is not an excuse for negligence but I think many parks that are, or have the ability to produce relatively higher returns can actually have a lower level of risk , at least that is how I would perceive it in some case......

‘Yes’ from the standpoint that most brokers will perceive that you are brokering.

Renting out - prop 1 needs around 7-10k usd, i have only 5k and still cannot agree with my wife on taking a loan from a bank, coz for Kyrgyz people it is perceived as a very risky journey.

After listening to The 10X Rule I have come to the conclusion that taking 10x the perceived necessary action is the key to success.

Tbh, I did feel like wholesaling was a little unethical at one point, but I justified it by telling myself I am helping the seller (especially when they tried selling their home/s through a realtor) by helping them get out of their home.I'm not acting as a realtor because I have the house under contract...and I didn't mention it earlier but in every contract I've always included that the house would be marketed to other buyers.Either way, I don't think it's illegal but it could be perceived as borderline unethical.

Perhaps they just like to stick it to the man or they perceive that commercial customers will simply use more water.

If that is the case you have a huge potential problem if your exchange was ever audited to show a note and a mortgage (it doesn't have to be recorded but if not can be very easily perceived as fraudulent).  

That's puzzle piece number 1.Puzzle piece number 2 in the 1031 exchange is your reinvestment requirements - in this case you sold for 500K so you must buy for 500K.Puzzle piece #3 is that you netted after mortgage pay off 100K in cash - So you must use all 100K in the next purchase or purchases.So now just run the scenarios - your potential tax bill in CA on 100K of profit could easily be  30,000 or more.If you do a 1031 and buy for 500K and use all 100K in cash then you would pay no tax.If you do a 1031 and buy for 400K then the IRS perceives that as taking 100K in profit called boot (yes you might say that it is a return of capital or whatever but they have nuclear weapons and you don't so their interpretation wins).  

You are contemplating a reverse so you will actually get to double dip the NOI on all properties during the 180 days.I would say the biggest hurdles are going to be what your perceiving - the need to sell in 180 days.  

Many real estates specialists totally neglect to perceive the prevalent advantages that accompany owning area in its raw structure.