Twenty-four hours is presumed to be a reasonable notice in the absence of evidence to the contrary.(9) Promptly commence an action under Chapter 1923. of the Revised Code, after complying with division (C) of section 5321.17 of the Revised Code, to remove a tenant from particular residential premises, if the tenant fails to vacate the premises within three days after the giving of the notice required by that division and if the landlord has actual knowledge of or has reasonable cause to believe that the tenant, any person in the tenant's household, or any person on the premises with the consent of the tenant previously has or presently is engaged in a violation as described in division (A)(6)(a)(i) of section 1923.02 of the Revised Code, whether or not the tenant or other person has been charged with, has pleaded guilty to or been convicted of, or has been determined to be a delinquent child for an act that, if committed by an adult, would be a violation as described in that division.

The term is often describing someone who is remarkably attractive (above a 7.9), but not at all ******* crazy, amazing at sex, and has a great personality...”I can only wish someone would “disrespect” me like that...But you did think that I was disrespectful to you: While I can see how “Al D” could be presumed to be (the real) “Donald T” in a real estate investors forum, in your case, the real “Al D” meant “unicorn” as no more than “a very rare find,” which should have been understood as such in the context of that same paragraph - which also happened to be the paragraph where I praised you comprehension skills...

Rents are income and interest on the mortgage is deductible, but both must be reported separately, presumably in your case on Sch E.Wife's say the darndest things.

There are eight activities that are considered brokerage activities. 475.42 says brokering without a license is a 3rd degree felony. 475.43, the presumptive statute, states that anyone offering one of the eight brokerage activities is PRESUMED to be brokering WITHOUT a license and it is up to that person to PROVE they are not.

Presumably they recognized gain or loss on their partnership interests since they received cash.

", be careful that sounds like you might be giving accounting advise and presumably without a license.

I am presuming no.

And importanty, you'll have your funds on an after/tax basis, presumably free from the long arm of the IRS.

That lease language is a little ambiguous, you could read it as saying that as long as the guest is not there more than 15 consecutive days they don't need to tell you, where presumably what you actually want is to know about anyone who is there for long lengths of time.My general rule of thumb is to remember that tenants get to live their lives, have guests, etc.  

One would presume that means this particular lien, although it could be a second IRS lien.