1 August 2014 | 57 replies
The kitchen included replacing appliances, cabinets, countertops, and fixtures at a cost around $2500, not including replacing the flooring and the demo, which wasn't broken out by room.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd867/cd86753f84c17fa224aa322008250a6a7d7163d0" alt=""
18 December 2016 | 28 replies
Lots of them were built on fill including trash, demo debris and ashes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39056/39056f0b07586ebec98d15fcd89d44305f8af2b9" alt=""
30 July 2015 | 15 replies
Now I'm back in demo mode to remove the Ditra and thinset and start over with cement backer board.
7 June 2016 | 19 replies
@Yang Xiao @Sterling White Josh C.I have read quite a few concerns on maintenance and turnover too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2944/b29449712a8c6081b11eccb69a9e11f704f998a2" alt=""
16 November 2014 | 6 replies
We provided all the existing system demo, replaced the 4x10 'boots', framed in the return (we relocated it from a floor return to a end-of-hall wall return), and paid for permits and the third party duct test.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ac39/2ac396feea2863ab91e2953dda6a9ab14bc67960" alt=""
3 January 2015 | 7 replies
Steven Yang those numbers look very similar to my current residence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f4e2/1f4e23b89bff87b231d0e92da649bbbad573968e" alt=""
18 February 2014 | 10 replies
Watch the procedure for rehabbing and flipping and maybe clean up, put away tools or some light demo would help.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f82b/6f82b9d4e1a9986f09d05ab813312d2d7ec93d56" alt=""
1 November 2013 | 9 replies
For me, the most extreme was with Leon Yang...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af0fb/af0fbeabed3dcb77b75d5d941845eef7f0d1d881" alt=""
10 December 2013 | 30 replies
Why can't you simply put a padlock on it (or demo it?!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc686/cc6863eff9777cfcac16a4d0fe330703fa39927e" alt=""
10 January 2014 | 34 replies
I think what both of you are saying is that likelihood (or probability) is less when you are not leveraged (fewer units) , The impact could be more severe than if you leveraged and owned more units Let me quantify Basis From example above $300K start with $50 K houses / Rent $750 Expenses (%50) $375 ( you still have taxes and insurance regardless if you carry a mortgage or not) Appreciation 5% Option 1 Buy 6 $50K houses free and clear Starting equity = (300K value – 0 Loan Balance) = 300K Income = $750 Expenses (%50) $375 Cash Flow $375 Times 6 units = 2250 Month (same as Mr Duncan Demo) Option 2 Buy 12 $50K houses ($25K Down, $25K Financed) Starting equity = (600K value – 300K Loan Balance) = 300K Income = $750 Expenses (%50) $375 P&I (25K at %5 for 30 years yields monthly payment of $134 Cash Flow $240 Times 12 units =$ 2880 Month Risk assessment / Management While the probability of getting a bad tenant is more with the greater # of units, The IMPACT would be less: Risk Analysis Hazard : getting a bad tenant that late/skips on rent Effect: you lose one months rent ($750) Probability of Incidence (PofI) = in our example 1 in 20 (5%) Option 1 PofI = 6 units *(.05) = 30% chance Impact + (-$750 cash flow ) -> Net cash goes from $2250 to (2250-750) $1500 a (%33) decrease Option 2 PofI - 12 units * .05 = %60 chance you get stuck Impact = ((-$750) cash flow -> net cash goes from $2880 to (2880 – 750) 2130 = 26% decrease So while the chance Is greater with multiple units , the impact is lessoned due to the other income streams.