If your protection is "limited" as the tile implies with LLC, and CA is horrible state for litigation and taxes, and judges give very little respect to elaborate asset protection schemes to protect debtors (you), so what option do you have? 

If your protection is “limited” as the tile implies with LLC, and CA is horrible state for litigation and taxes, and judges give very little respect to elaborate asset protection schemes to protect debtors (you), what option do you have?

@Cameron Moore sorry for the dumb question but how does roof age affect the premium - newer roof implies higher premium (because replacement cost is now higher) or a lower premium (because it may not get damaged easily with for eg hails).

Some would say, finding a Realtor that only has 1 income stream is better, though to me, there is always implied pressure of "please like this home, and buy it so I can pay my mortgage/rent".

A higher rate always implies higher risk and/or a compromise with your liquidity.

Brokers and agents are prohibited from using advertising that implies in any way that the house is for sale by owner.  

I would strongly advise against partying with your tenants as you implied a few pages back.

I'm trying to determine if it implies that the tenant pays the property taxes.

Could the above question imply that, as long as I ensure my properties/tenants are not a nuisance to neighbors, I can proceed w/out concern?

He is a RE exam-prep trainer who films his training sessions with his students.