There are risk so to gloss over those risk for the sake of selling mentorships is concerning. exactly Joe.. 

While no formal laws say this is restricted, we are getting notices saying the request is not feasible due to XYZ concerns.

A lawyer could speak to it better, but I would be concerned about screening this way. 2.

Sounds like a good plan, should have plenty of options available.I would be cognizant of any group you talk with on two areas, the location of the property including any potential concerns of it being 'rural', as well as the minimum purchase price and/or minimum loan amounts.

I am concerned that it is a ponsi scheme.  

Quote from @Celli Mowery: Hi Jamesinteresting message -I know I’ve seen your name often on the Bluegrass Investors GroupI have spent the last 5 years investing in London and while some of the concerns you mentioned did exist when we started I’m finding we haven’t had issues with tradesmen coming from Lexington & Richmond for us in recent years.

Well it looks like non-profits are exempt....So I suppose Dope Traffickers will just buy an ongoing concern non profit and operate that with ownership as an IBC (International Business Corporation) in some privacy haven, or Russia, or Yemin or somewhere (if those places have privacy laws???)

I have been trying to dig a little deeper into John's concerns and waiting to hear back from Airbnb on them.

In this way, I never need to be concerned about justifying my charge to their deposit because the damage is clear and obvious. 

I'm more concerned about appreciation and equity so I'm willing to trade the cash flow for it, but I don't want to be in a situation where I'm barely breaking even and the stress that comes with it.Looking for ideas how I can tap into that equity to grow my portfolio but still getting some kind of cash flow to be able to make the monthly payments1.