Leave your price too low and you leave money on the table, too high and your occupancy will be abysmal.

Relying on a property tax assessment for this information may result in leaving deductions on the table.

I've heard of people doing it 'under the table' but what's the best way to do it for both parties? 

Thank you so much for the link to the table showing title insurance.

That said, over a long time horizon, and for investors who are willing to take chips off the table and not continually double down on PML, it's a great return and the spread is large enough to make a big difference.

the porter case is the classic rip the rents dont pay on the first original owner get screwed.

But your current situation with syndication losses doesn’t fall under the classic 1031 rules.

I suspect poor communication was a reason that such a low percentage of people who paid $300 atrended (in San Diego I attended the STR workshop and room was full - this syndication workshop we sat around one table).I have heard Codie present and she is as good as you indicate but not an RE person. one of her lines is something like there are a lot of millionaire RE investors but not a lot of billionaire RE investors and I want to be a billionaire.  

They are the classic bad syndication company that makes risky investments with bad financing structures.

They are the classic bad syndication company that makes risky investments with bad financing structures.