If you ever have to go to court on something like this you will be in the odd position of being both the landlord and the tenant, so I would leave nothing to chance or interpretation.Personally, I agree with Nathan - I'd have real questions about any potential tenants that were OK with this kind of arrangement. 

Go to local court website (or in person if necessary) and look up landlord-tenant docket.

From the City to the courts, the police, the litigation lawyers, the inspectors, the utility companies and worst of all the tenants. 

This requires a minimum of TWO booked and completed stays, one is not enough, as was tested in court.

Per https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/61839/MNOI...Fair return defined Kenneth Barr method (MNOI) which the Courts have agreed with:“as the price controls are not confiscatory; i.e, they do not deprive investorsof a fair return on their investment.”  

She was finally served the court notice after several failed attempts.

If you’re selling your home to a stranger, have a solid contract that has been tested in the courts.

No standing in court = no case to bring.

And whatever controversy there is, it has not been tested in courts, as far as I know. 

Guidelines are in Appendix A to Furnisher Rule Part 660    Can you meet that obligation through frontlobby or would that mean you are limited to court judgements?