This isn't totally necessary, but meeting property owners if you need to is a great way to win a deal

Wins?

You do that, it's going to be best place to start because I am betting from there you will seek how to simplify things. 

If you win, it's because they wanted you to win and they bid you up. yup I used to be one of those characters.. 

Even if it not in your lease you can still negotiate a win/win solution.

The GC and the sub ended up sharing in the cost mostly (I think) because it was better than the finger pointing game that had already started, and realistically the attorney's were the only ones about to win...

But, I bet-ya it's also effective.  

Quote from @Jonathan Grzeszczyk: I agree that the motivation and problem is the core, but the first question is always where are you going when we come to a win-win agreement for you to sell me your house.

It’s a win-win: investors get the capital they need to grow their portfolios, and lenders earn competitive returns with a relatively low-risk investment.It’s worth considering if you're looking for more funding options or better returns!

I found a win - win situation for the corporate owner, the rail road land owner, and the community who were plagued by the vagrants steeling and causing mischief.