As the bad apples make everyone look bad and be presumed guilty of malfeasance, which ultimately means less investment $$$ and longer due diligence cycles and legal costs. 

But plead guilty to the main charge and we'll drop the remaining 9 charges. 

Amenities need to serve the needs of both the resident and the tenant, or they don't make it inside.This is a great point (that I also find myself guilty of as a guest) that I did not think of.

I suspect the landlord was found not guilty.

When the transaction didnt close, you simply should have received your funds back.So what Im seeing here is the guilty party is probably the title company.

Even if I were sued, I document everything and obey the law, so I won't be found guilty.

Even if I were sued, I document everything and obey the law, so I won't be found guilty.

Then I've seen more experienced investors on BP explain things using finance terminology and I'm not a finance major or work in any part of finance, trading etc - maybe I'm just dumb and am sharing two brain cells with my cat LOL I am guilty of using LTR (Long Term Rentals), MTR (Mid Term Rentals) and STR (Short Term Rentals).

If this was a publicly traded security we’d be guilty of trading on inside information, etc., but that does not apply to real property transactions.  

Seems like tens of millions of dollars were raised from unaccredited investors...Here are some SEC links for a partner and CFO of Norada showing previous fraud history:https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releas...https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2017/comp240...Based on what has been uncovered so far with the partnership between Marco and Ronald Fossum who has already been guilty of defrauding investors and barred by the SEC from participating in activity like this, I would say, yeah, there is a high likelihood of fraud in this case.