This implies if you sold and bought the exact same house your current property tax would increase substantially.  

I believe they played a role raising capital for these deals, but the language used on their track record implies they played a very active role in the sourcing, execution and sale of the assets, which is very likely not the case. 

they DONT  these guys are trainers there is huge money in it far more than they could make actually wholesaling .. think about it the amount of properties that can be wholesaled is quite small actually very very narrow real estate nicheThe amount of dreamers who want to  make money wholesaling and then buy rentals then retire ( this is a common theme among those who start the wholesaling gig). 

This implies residential units can be built at lower costs and provide better return. 11) adding an ADU to SFH can make the SFH fall under rent control.

I completely agree with your implied notion that if I were going to do this, it would absolutely be more beneficial to do it myself especially with an insignificant down payment like 3.5%.

This implies they are probably the cause of the issue.

This math implies that the property is being purchased at a 14% discount to current market value. 

I do not know him, but the path he is leading you is a difficult path    Note difficult does not imply impossible; there are people who are successful with S8 housing    In my area s8 is so undesirable that they write laws trying to make it challenging to not allow S8 tenants.  

She's not going to have any leg to stand on in court if you get that far unless there's some explicit language prohibiting the owner from assigning responsibilities to another legally authorized party, and I'm guessing there isn't if another PM company was maintaining the lease and provisions - and the fact that the tenant was voluntarily working with the other PM confirms the acceptance of an authorized agent even if it's not explicitly stated, the same way if you accept rent from a tenant after a lease expires you imply acceptance of the lease terms continuing (which is why you should always have a holdover provision). 

At today’s rates, most properties at high LTV are negative even with 1% rent to value ratio   This implies the 1% rule is far from assuring positive cash flow   Good luck