In the instance you refer too, this is in florida and I have seen in FL defendants get attorneys fees covered.

And what's really crazy are the number of people vigorously defending this nonsense, clueless as to even the basics of finance, mathematics, or even simple arithmetic. 

Once someone has paid, what to them is a good deal of money, and invested a good deal of time, and become emotionally involved with a particular mentor and his program, they’ll fight like hell to defend it.  

It took us 10 months for a court to make a decision on a case where we were the plaintiff and the defendant did not even file a response to our motion to dismiss. 

Cash-flow is for "keeping the lights on" as in covering operational expenses to defend against any need for additional capital investment. 

You rushing to defend another customer we had doesn't make your slander look any better.

@Preethi S. understand your concerns about PMCs defending themselves and throwing owners under the bus.But... how is it okay for you to NOT share all the context, yet throw the PMC under the bus, and by extension all PMCs?

Europe did not have the capability of holding the line and defending against Soviet invasion without the USA. 

It is a national disgrace that nothing has been done on behalf of the victims.Clinton, and the institutions involved, should have been co-defendants in a criminal case in Federal Court. 

Then the owner of said program would respond defending his/her program.