It sucks to admit that there wasn't tight oversite on the deal to ferret this out b4 the sale happened and its subsequent consequences and it sucks for your client that they have made, for at least the time being, an investment that is not going to be in the black in the immediate future. 

Also had a random thought how it’s interesting that these laws are getting passed by the state and they seem to magically get altered in the subsequent years in very significant ways.

Bird in hand is better than 2 in the bush, especially when the two in the bush do not have the money.we are seeing a lot of companies now try and get seller financing and then arbitrage it to renters - similar to STR arbitrage but just arbitrage it with a loan and collect the rent and if the tenant stops paying they walk away and you are stuck with the home, the foreclosure and the subsequent eviction.

Its very likely that all subsequent posts will be equally one-sided.

We used the tax assessed value to help determine the value of the land and subsequently our bid.

(I literally made my money back for the training on subsequent real estate deals.)  

Land Home Financial Services seeking an "order enjoining Land Home from continuing as 'servicer' of loans held by AHP Entities, or previously held by AHP Entities but subsequently transferred pursuant to abused and now-revoked powers of attorney."

Maybe it can be a little cheaper on subsequent deals, if you aren't changing much.Loan apps: while you may be able to have some investor money funded before this is due, you may not.  

Now it has CA code that protects them from jurisdictions that could advocate for their removal which would result in less safe units being available.It is an interesting dilemma especially if after the initial law they pass a subsequent law extending the dates.  

I demonstrated in a subsequent post that two of the many claims you stated as fact simply aren't true.There's absolutely nothing to learn from that video.