If tenant fails to appear you might win right then.

It appears that fincen has neglected to update (at least) that page.  

.: Quote from @Tom Gimer: You can't take an element from state X such as "uniqueness" and try to apply it in state Y where that appears not to even be part of the analysis.Let's see how this turns out. 

@Tom HallAt 7% if you can I would pay it down as investing it net after tax gains may not get you the 7% you are paying - so it’s less riskDownside is you lose liquidity of that money as it’s tied in your propertyIf rates come down in future you can refinance and even take some of the cash out.Regarding your question are rates coming down, a lot of factors come into play but right now it does not appear there will be significant changes to rates over next 3-6 months.

The only thing that might give me pause would be if I did not have sufficient capital on a building that was older but had appeared to have significant maintenance issues when I was looking at it to buy.

These contracts are both dated 2019 and appear to be lease agreements for solar equipment that I, nor the mortgage lender, were ever a party to.

I'm not too hung up on this, because the margins still appear very attractive (from what the agent speculated ARV). my hesitancy stems from a lack of experience and direct steps/plan of action to take on a property I like. 

It may not appear this way on the surface but you are going to come out ahead by focusing on purchasing fewer but quality assets rather than becoming a door accumulator.

If you were you promoting your services to our members, the site will auto-ban you, too.It appears that your ban has been lifted.

Now it appears they can set up a Fincen Identification record which puts the pressure on the partner vs the partnership but penalties could still accrue.