
9 February 2020 | 4 replies
It actually does not function correctly in practice.Before an owner requires a tenant to list him as an additional insured, the following points should be considered.In the event of a lawsuit between the tenant and the property owner (both named insureds), the insurance company would have the obligation to defend both parties against each other and to pay any sums either might be obligated to pay each other.

13 August 2020 | 3 replies
They will have a boiler plate lease that they provide to their clients so that it is easier to defend the client if needed.

6 March 2017 | 9 replies
To successfully defend a 1031 if necessarily you'd have to demonstrate that you changed your intent from primary to investment and from hold to resale.

25 June 2023 | 5 replies
Someone who of course follows the law, but who believes that landlords have the right to enforce the law and defend landlord rights.

30 March 2023 | 685 replies
Slapping 4% on it and defending it because that's what the bank told you is ridiculous.

11 August 2016 | 26 replies
But it seems like your getting a lot of negitive responce sabout the area and you are now defending your descision.

9 June 2015 | 78 replies
Once recorded it affects the defendant's credit, ability to buy and often the ability to rent.

8 December 2017 | 19 replies
Also, contrary to popular belief, an “Additional Insured” is ONLY afforded liability protection under the liability portion of the policy and there is no coverage whatsoever for physical losses resulting from such things as vandalism, theft, fire, wind and hail, and so on.A PM trainer by the name of Judy Cook had some interesting points: Yet it seemed to be more beneficial for the PM company to be listed as Additionally Insured so to help focus on accomplishing the task of defending against a tenant suit.http://judycook.biz/additional-insured-vs-addition...So additionally insured seems great for commercial property, commercial business, endeavors but could be confusing for Landlords.

25 September 2015 | 29 replies
If they are SSI or an income that is not able to be garnished the bank or defendant will have to explain.

6 May 2015 | 63 replies
Not once, If you knew how to read and comprehend at the same time, you would see that it was I that got beat up, simply because the people on this site do not like wholesalers, which by the way, I didn't defend.