They're true in literal terms but they're wildly false in the way he presents it to his audience and how his audience perceives what he's saying.  

There are too many wannabes watching too many "reality" TV shows paying absurd prices for properties they will lose their proverbial shorts on.

There was a tenant living on one side and the other was vacant.After living and remodeling the vacant side, I moved into the tenant occupied side (he moved out) to start the remodel process there.After looking into permits to upgrade the electrical system, I ran across information about the property that revealed it to be a single family home.The zoning for the property does not allow for multi families.Am I able to sue the seller or the seller’s agent for misleading information/false advertising?

But we pay those same absurd water bills on vacant properties. 

They keep complaining that they want move out for which I also offered options and mutual resolutions.today all of a sudden I was surprised by a letter from their attorney claiming that I falsely advertised my home and used “bait and switch” tactics to deceive them.

But in the end, it was a shady move by Nightingale.This situation really highlights the false sense of security some of these crowdfunding platforms can give.

The stuff being sold is generally in marginal areas, at low cap rates, with false underwriting.

Not one thing presented was false.

More importantly, exaggerated income creates false expectations.

The idea of not having a loan on your credit report frees you of the DTI constraint is completely false.