data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce94d/ce94da5771aaad81ddf6c612107afbe1a09df379" alt=""
22 June 2007 | 10 replies
Some will tell you to never bet on future appreciation.John Corey
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48c94/48c94923cfc7d67ce532d0d4e8800b377c9e22ec" alt=""
20 September 2007 | 6 replies
In such an arrangement, the trustee cannot take any action without the written consent of all the beneficiaries.It's a little like you and I making a bet on the Super Bowl.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76abb/76abb283bbedf3428b32077421f790ed3b52bb68" alt=""
15 January 2008 | 32 replies
Originally posted by "mpark":I give it 30 to 45 days and the lenders will ease up enough to get these deals done.Do not bet on it.
27 September 2007 | 3 replies
Incorporating. C or S Corp?
Hello Everyone,
I’m forming a great partnership with an associate in developing an Investment company but are running into confusion on the structure of the new entity . For most smaller...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d5a/05d5a9c8b4ad974474929f9d5198944dd73d62c5" alt=""
24 September 2007 | 5 replies
It is a bet on appreciation where there is no guarantee that past performance will continue into the future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cec27/cec27b00f4e88eb3ff6f98933731be4291603baf" alt=""
7 March 2008 | 4 replies
I agree - there is usually a "locking mechanism" type thing - try raising the window & snap it out - then look in the channel - there is probably something in the shape of a C or U depending on which way it is turned.....this usually controls the tension rod.....play with that & then make sure they are both locked back in place parallel to each other - then re-insert the window & try it...That in itself may work....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
17 October 2011 | 12 replies
I would bet on the over too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00f4d/00f4da1ea675ba6c408306bdfe7e1cb7acebbf3d" alt=""
21 October 2011 | 4 replies
I wouldn't bet on that.I mean, it beats a savings account or bond... but there's better money to be made.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aae5/4aae5206ab14c25fb44f1138cbc5e94a71b08e58" alt=""
21 November 2011 | 18 replies
You do not have to pay both.Here is the MA Secretary of State link: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cor/corpweb/corllc/llcinf.htm#anchor1539138
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ec3b/0ec3b720ede2bb69034fe31a32b61a2005c47c5a" alt=""
21 November 2011 | 12 replies
Originally posted by Evan Huston:A single-member LLC is a "disregard entity" to the IRS and treated like a sole-proprietorship.True enough Evan, unless the owner of that single-member LLC elects to have the LLC taxed as a corporation (either C or S).