data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32160/32160a21b0c495829b494ce18b6f32385f87397b" alt=""
9 October 2014 | 126 replies
Just reread what you posted and I think I get it now.Why not do the lease/option?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c54fd/c54fddba5efceb914b888f0a3ac70da0cf0eabf8" alt=""
17 December 2013 | 20 replies
You know, now that I go back and re-read the first post in this thread, I think we are helping someone with their homework.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dba96/dba966dc98da6a2b4139dc28c83a208a226371dc" alt=""
1 August 2014 | 18 replies
I re-read what you posted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f5ef/0f5ef43d8a1b4ae05cb5a6531505fd535278b7f9" alt=""
19 December 2013 | 8 replies
Doesn't matter if its called an assignment fee or finder's fee ....its profit that the wholesaler [Jason & other] are looking to secure from the end buyer.Sorry I was in overdrive multitasking and had to re-read and edit my point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31d8a/31d8a97a4e4222ede07fbcec36daf4709211779a" alt=""
14 November 2015 | 144 replies
This is because I have to send letters to neighboring properties for subdivision so I would just be setting myself up for failure.I will reread this thread next year and hopefully laugh at everything because it will be over and I will have learned a lot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1754f/1754f370ab02d96f414ca28e05f641128b5533b5" alt=""
12 February 2014 | 38 replies
No pun intended.Now that you re-read your posts, that's a conservative approach, but it will incur a city & county transfer tax on 50% of the ownership from the private lender/partner to Zac.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe80a/fe80ac1826b1af0e29fa5a5888925ff08818fe2e" alt=""
18 January 2014 | 29 replies
In this case, "if" it is how the tenant presented it the orders could be emailed in 5 minutes along with a marriage cert.....just doesn't smell right @Patrick Connell I stand corrected as I needed to get out a lease and reread and it does say "or" dependent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/177b0/177b00b03e56b781fcf2c47d691da68b091f5f78" alt=""
14 January 2014 | 15 replies
@Chris Al,I should reread my posts before I click on the "Post reply."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40335/40335c66696290c9c196fe81e10cb23e6f368a7b" alt=""
27 June 2014 | 5 replies
Sorry, I just re-read Mark's first post and realized that the trust deed income is not eligible on Schedule E, so it can't be offset against losses reported on that form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa98e/fa98ebac7eeb23ae91d376f52197c75d3b923d6c" alt=""
27 June 2014 | 6 replies
That is assuming the numbers are close - re read Mike D's point above