I interpret the above to mean that late charges will be assessed on the 5th day of the month, or in other words, the tenant has until 11:59 p.m. on the 4th day of the month (3 days after due date) to pay without extra charges.

In my former job I would read in depth not only the Federal Register, but any interpretation of the laws (federal and state) that I could.  

v=nGz6fHdxP30my mom called from nyc 5am pacific this morn, to ask is the huge quake hit us here in socal.. she didnt know but i threw on the laptop and went to see whats going on.. apparently a prediction's going viral based on some planetary aligment happening; a dutch dude interpreting some Nostradamus predictions into a 9.8M(!)

Many doctors will argue that sustaining the body after brain-death IS playing God, and that by just turning off the machines, they are not violating the Oath at all.Again, I can see both sides, but certainly that is one reasonable interpretation.

If this is a gray area and you repeating the same practice (Contract assignment) which could be interpreted in the spirit of the law as brokering, they may keep fining you.

A common interpretation I have seen municipalities take contradicts what Senator Wienkowski implied.A common interpretation that municipalities have applied is that once the house is over 15 years old with an ADU, the house is rent controlled. 

I disagree at least with tone (my interpretation).  

(The IRS does attempt to interpret the law as 750 hr per property, which is utterly ridiculous and has been finally dispelled by a recent Tax Court decision.)RE Pro is a very complicated (and very regularly audited) area.

In my interpretation, the discounted rent, or least amount of rent, is the rent you actually want, e.g. $1000.

Am I interpretting that correctly or not?