On most BP posts, many erroneously use cap rate as a performance measure which cap rate is not. 

There are pro and cons of a license afterall, and at the moment, I'd err on the side of caution.

They will err on the side of caution and say yes you need one or tell you they don't know.

@Matthew Carlson, one of my favorite memes or all time is a note beside an empty glass saying Dear Optimist and pessimist,Had a great drink while you were arguing about half full/half empty.the OpportunistMost people will err on the side of underestimating adverse events. 

Same thing for my posts in this forum are only my opinion and a not a legal brief nor advice.But for the sake of the topic, and to educate readers and myself, I'll be interested to get your opinion on where my previous post was erroneous.

@William C.Agree, it’s a very slippery slope and I always err on the side of covering my and my clients a$$ as much as possible.

You seem to be operating under either of two erroneous assumptions: 1. the licensure board has authority to regulate all real estate transactions in the Commonwealth--they do not, they regulate any person acting as an agent that participates in them for a fee; and 2. that assigning a contract or making a profit on selling property creates an agency or a fiduciary relationship--it could, but not when done properly.

Making erroneous declarations about the mechanisms creating the savings, and subsequently what their actual effect is on the savings, is something I would categorize as 'misleading' at best.So, while good on you for saving yourself a healthy chunk of money, don't be surprised when people challenge you on the assertion that it's coming from the tooth fairy leaving it under your pillow.

He’s got work on his invoice that was never done, erroneous charges, and changes to the original contract that we’re never solidified in writing but he’s now trying to charge me for.

I always err on the side of caution.