data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9c59/c9c59a043fee3b64ba9f8728d871f24d24816fd7" alt=""
24 January 2025 | 6 replies
@Bob OkenwaYep, that makes sense to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3c80/c3c809d51e1eb2993de4cfb07c2c2f24ac0a67de" alt=""
30 January 2025 | 19 replies
Quote from @Calvin Thomas: Flat fee makes little sense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96e6d/96e6d74885a73cd3c48a1a18979b04fdcb8d30a4" alt=""
9 February 2025 | 173 replies
I think it totally makes sense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b886e/b886ec6cc625b5be3a48ca7bb5e3df8aa9fb6acc" alt=""
1 February 2025 | 14 replies
@Noy Rivlin Most single family homes that make sense as rental properties are about $125k-$225k.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8e1d/f8e1dbed3601e7c7c39fcf610b74f79a924d3054" alt=""
23 January 2025 | 10 replies
You only get a sense of this by meeting face-to-face once or twice.A bad borrower can kill a great project.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98b38/98b38313c13aecd300aec895c22e19957c71c36c" alt=""
8 February 2025 | 14 replies
Hey jason, a lot of investors based in markets like California and New York are choosing to purchase their investments OOS in the Midwest because of the affordability and numbers making more sense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6eb0/f6eb02f1e6c9ff15c2ce185dcec5ced8506a11af" alt=""
14 February 2025 | 25 replies
@Nathan GesnerThat makes a lot of sense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7021a/7021aeca65dbe89b6dbae57710cbca4888ba59a2" alt=""
24 January 2025 | 21 replies
When you’re investing with leverage, I think it makes more sense to do it in a market that’s showing plenty of signs for growth.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb737/fb7376c05ebd24d543b856ab9d0f971a3258613f" alt=""
18 February 2025 | 33 replies
The figure for without compounding makes perfect sense to me.For compounding, I took PPR's example, and calculated the annualized return:With the following numbers:A = $1,431,237.45P = $1,000,000.00t = 3This produced an annualized return of 12.68% over the 3 years with compounding.What am I doing wrong in this calculation (I'm certainly not a quant)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4f94/b4f9468567c9cd3e86c34b745f0c564f1c8af3cd" alt=""
18 February 2025 | 13 replies
Makes sense thank you!