Of course I can increase deductibles or otherwise decrease coverage, but that is only putting off the inevitable expensive insurance claim.

The tenant will legitimately claim the seals were of poor quality to begin with.

Also, most Umbrella Policies only pay out if your underlying policy pays out, and the underlying policy will do everything they can to find an exclusion or that you were negligent (which you probably were) in the cause of action to get out of paying the claim.

So again their AP claim is unlikely to be valid since they haven't paid the tax on that piece. 

You claim to receive no remuneration for this from the syndicates you are pitching- but only time will tell if you're the only guy not getting paid to raise money for others.

They may justifying paying more by claiming they’re paying the premium for the “business”, but since the “business” and the real property are inseparable the property owner will still benefit from the increased value due to the arbitrager efforts.  

@Mohammed Islam, The claim of loss due to the tenant moving out for the sale COULD absolutely apply to the situation.

@Edwing Hernandez Lots of unsupported claims...same story with Roofstock...nothing like getting on camera and claiming you have a magic formula but no evidence of what's in the potion....they want you to go on faith alone, I guess...

Best thing to do is avoid the higher DTI debt to income, claim one as investment and use the rents to offset the new purchase. 

I've seen alot of people say to just go through the conventional lending, and then quitdeed claim it into the llc.