Positive rental history since the time of eviction is one way to demonstrate a change in behavior.

If the tenant resumes the same behavior again file much faster to avoid two months of not collecting rent.

You're essentially rewarding the bad behavior to escape a greater loss and then dumping them on the next unsuspecting Landlord.

I figure the prospective tenant "should" be on their best behavior during initial interactions with me (just like a job interview). 

And yes, I definitely know they were probably on their best behavior, although I was really surprised at the number of places I went to see where the tenants were really rude and not at all people I would want to rent to.   

Most brokers and salesperson that get into trouble with the State Real Estate Commission because: (1) they have a conflict with a consumer; and (2) the consumer reports the behavior to the Commission.

Would this "advertising-like" behavior be in some sort of violation of some Law somewhere? 

I mean it seems to be the right kind of place because at night you don't see questionable behavior, i.e. prostitutes, drug deals, etc.

@Jim K.It's like being upset with your child or dog for bad behavior.

We end up recycling the same bad tenants, rewarding their bad behavior, because some cheap landlord wouldn’t pay the $71 to get a judgment and/or possession.