you can pencil whip it any way you want but reality is rentals are 5 to 10% return COC these days.. if its a quality building nothing wrong with your tenant paying off your property.. and your using max leverage.and rents being that low I have to think there could be some upward movement over time. although personally 600 dollar renters in my experience can be a lot of work with higher than normal turn over given the subsistence income the tenants make.

I'm really trying to help the tiny house movement become an industry.

They seem to prefer the freedom of movement with as few attachments as possible.

Nothing major, no roofs, wall movements, replumbing, rewiring, new heat, anything like that.

Not a ton of movement as I increased the notice to move until the end of the school year as requested by some of the tenants.

We the people" need to stop complaining about it and start a movement for it's replacement.Now since the banks that we are giving all this bailout money too own the fed and we pay them interest on the money we get from the fed and interest on the money they then turn around and "loan" us.

The were going to be paying $15k+ over median salary to those 16, and that's the only real company movement I've found in recent years. 

Look for signs of major movement within the house.

The problem is if you do not do your homework, you can get stuck in a cheaper property that is in the wrong area and the losses, vacancy and vandalism will be a perpetual loss that will be insurmountable to overcome.  

-That contract parameters are up to landlord discretion as long as tenant agrees to it, even if it says "renews in perpetuity until mutual dissolution" -That there is no maximum cap in California but you can only set years, not open ended.