[i] Now you can interpret this many ways....as an investor, I don't need to TELL MY NEGOTIATOR (i.e. my facilitator) that I have a higher offer and the facilitator really has no knowledge...Technically in my case, we usually don't have an offer by approval.

You are not helping that goal by getting into an argument here with the other poster.You can convey the exact same information about cash flow + appreciation without getting into your interpretation of what someone else said in that thread.

For any increase to be upheld by the tenant-friendly courts here, I interpret this to mean that I need to have a written agreement I can show to a judge in case there is a dispute (hence, the lease addendum).I guess I'm just trying to figure out a way that streamlines this process while not alienating a paying tenant with something unnecessarily heavy-handed (i.e.

What I extracted from their interpretation was, yes as Dec 31, 2026, is less than 10 years away for the most taxpayer if they do this right now and afterwards, the deadline is expected to be renewed for a taxpayer to fully take advantage of this provision.

You need clear interpretation of what the report MEANS....not just "mold present".

In fact, 5 ILCS 140/3.3 provides that FOIA “is not intended to compel public bodies to interpret or advise requesters as to the meaning or significance of the public records.”

(It is an Urban renewal zone)**as I suspected, the owner visits the lot once a year (which I interpret as scrambling possession) and I don’t want any misunderstandings If the owner decides to visit the lot and I have possession. 

The varying interpretations of what "as-is" actually means is part of the reason that waiving inspection on "as-is" listings is becoming more common in highly competitive markets. 

Voucher is income, it doesn't reduce the income requirement.I believe they are interpreting this incorrectly.

If I'm interpreting the article right the dwelling wasn't permitted for occupancy at all, even before the shower remodel.