Also, what I was told per the notary was ;There is a difference between a “sworn to clause” and a “notary acknowledgement”.

Acknowledging the countless time this question has been asked over the years, I'll just add a couple clarifying points I don't see in the near universal recommendation around Schlage Encode locks: 1.

@Jim Macedon,he acknowledged that a long time ago but he is saying what he said.

I sign addendums all the time acknowledging correct name.  

For what it's worth, my past, and current management agreements state:  "Agent shall indemnify and hold Owner harmless from any loss, costs, damages, suits and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) arising from any negligent act of omission of the Agent"I'm not a lawyer, but that language makes me much more comfortable with the PM;  we both acknowledge our responsibilities and this clause tells me that the Agent is willing to take responsibility. 

The biggest red flag looks like the notarized acknowledgment that the building complies with all codes at the time of construction.

If they acknowledge it, let them know you are not selling.I hope it goes well for you!

And possibly even stamp it with a 'See attached notary acknowledgement/jurat/affidavit' (depends what it is) and then fill out a CA specific notary sheet to attach.

And I stay on it until the caseworker acknowledges receipt.There's really no reason for her to move with S8 - she's going to have a portion to pay no matter where she goes and it's going to be the same amount. 

You acknowledge you learned the requirement late and tried to do the best thing.