To the best of my knowledge, a plaintiff needs to prove negligence on part of the defender and unless you were notified of a problem and neglected to fix it, it is hard to prove.

I am glad your model worked for you, but be ready to defend your self on it.

Some agents feel like they have to defend their client, right or wrong, and "help" them get their dosit back.

It could be pretty difficult to defend yourself from a foreclosure while you are overseas and you could be liable for deficiencies.Do things the correct and proper way.  

Its hard to picture a scenario my evicted defendants would see as a "win"... other than simple charity.Bottom line-- I score houses at 58% of the ARV every week.  

The website you linked to said that prior liens like mortgages are wiped out but prior lien holders may not recognize that and you may have to defend against them. 

They'll defend them on logical reasons.When you asked naïve questions, you can turn the sellers concerns into positive things.

and the point of the post is I defend Detroit when it is used in a pejorative way.When posters say or imply "That only Stupid people invest in Detroit" I respond by implication "that only Stupid people don't"But to avoid hijacking this thread I will answer your questions in detail in the:Defending Detroit Thread HERE

The plaintiff is responsible to serve everything, and if the defendant defaults or loses, it just goes on their record; there is no notification (hey, loser - you lost). 

I really think this was just case of not understanding a few concepts and some of us defending "our" site.